9th Circuit Says No Hearing on Immigration TRO – That’s a Problem

Trump's Immigration Executive Order Case Could Reach Divided Supreme Court Without Record or Final Constitutional Rulings
9th Circuit Says No Hearing on Immigration TRO – That’s a Problem

Press Release (ePRNews.com) - WASHINGTON - Feb 06, 2017 - Many in the media are reporting that the appeals court, deciding whether or not to keep in place a lower court’s TRO preventing President Trump’s executive order on immigration from going into effect, has scheduled a hearing on the matter for 6:00 PM EST on Tuesday.

        But what they really mean is that there will be oral argument, not a hearing at which testimony under oath is presented, and that is one of the problems, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

        If the Supreme Court considers whatever the 9th Circuit decides regarding the TRO, there will be no proper factual record upon which to base a very important decision, notes Banzhaf.

        Several important constitutional issues – including not just the scope of the president’s authority over immigration, but also whether states can constitutionally raise (have standing to raise) the alleged constitutional rights of non-Americans in foreign countries –  is likely to be heard by a divided court, with many observers predicting a 4-4 tie. This would leave the decision in place, but not clarify the law in any way.

        In the meantime, many other lower court judges are still wrestling with these issues, and at least one has issued a lengthy decision validating Trump’s executive order.  This ruling could likewise make its way to the Supreme Court, and could likewise be upheld by a 4-4 vote.

        If there’s one thing all sides should agree on it is that important issues of constitutional law should be decided only when there is a clear and complete factual record based upon testimony given under oath, and subject to cross examination, not just conjectural arguments advanced by creative lawyers.

        When it’s not clear whether the number of visas affected is closer to 60,000 or to 100,000, and whether the visas in passports were physically rescinded (e.g., by stamps) or simply marked off on an electronic record, it’s hard to see how the justices can make any kind of a truly informed decision, says Banzhaf.

        Banzhaf has also suggested that Trump might be wise not to take the matter to the Supreme Court in the form of a TRO decision, but rather wait until after there is a final lower court ruling addressing all of the constitutional issues which has been reviewed by the 9th Circuit on the legal merits.  This way his new nominee is likely be on the Court, not only making it much more likely he will have considerable power over immigration during the remainder of his term, but also eliminating the possibility of a 4-4 indecisive tie.

        Banzhaf has also suggested – in a proposal featured on MSNBC, the Washington Examiner, Fox Business News, Drudge Report, etc. – that Trump consider requiring immigrants who cannot be satisfactorily vetted to wear GPS ankle monitors if the courts do not permit him to ban their admission to the country.

        Germany is using such monitors, Norway is considering it, and the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s “alternatives to detention” program already uses many thousands of them – all to very effectively and inexpensively provide surveillance of persons who might be suspected as potential terrorists.

Professor of Public Interest Law
George Washington University Law School,
FAMRI Dr. William Cahan Distinguished Professor,
Fellow, World Technology Network,
Founder, Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
2000 H Street, NW, Wash, DC 20052, USA
(202) 994-7229 // (703) 527-8418
http://banzhaf.net/  jbanzhafATgmail.com  @profbanzhaf

Source : Public Interest Law Professor John Banzhaf

CATEGORIES : Legal Services


Or using ePRNews Account

Don't have an account ? Sign Up

Register New Account

Already have an account ? Login

Reset Password

Already have an account ? Login


If you have any concerns regarding this press release, please contact the Author / Media Contact / Business of this press release. ePRNews is not resposible for the accuracy of the news posted and do not endorse, support any product/ services/ business mentioned and hereby disclaims any content contained in this press release.